Monday, July 27, 2009
Texting While Driving Studied
So when I read an article on just how distracting texting is, I felt it just had to be shared. Here is the link http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/28/technology/28texting.html
--
Friday, July 17, 2009
Rare Alberta OHS Acquittal
This information is courtesy of Field Law LLP in Calgary.
On July 2, 2009, the Provincial Court of Alberta acquitted a Calgary construction company of three charges under the Occupational Health and Safety Act. The decision is significant, as acquittals are exceedingly rare in OHS cases. Field Law lawyers Steve Eichler and Laura Buckingham represented the accused company.
The company was charged after an experienced heavy-duty mechanic was caught by a hydraulic mechanism underneath a piece of earth-moving equipment.
First, the company was charged with failing to ensure, as far as reasonably practicable, the safety of a worker. The Court found the accident itself was proof that the company failed to ensure the safety of the mechanic. The case therefore turned on whether the employer had done what was reasonably practicable to ensure safety. The Court noted the many steps the company had taken:
- Hiring: the company hired a qualified and experienced mechanic who had already taken many safety courses;
- Training: the company provided a general safety orientation and further written information;
- Manuals: the company provided a general safety manual and service manuals for all equipment, which included specific warnings; and
- Supervision: the mechanic regularly met with his supervisor, and had monthly reviews of his performance, including evaluation of safety.
The Court found the specific accident was not foreseeable. As the company had been diligent in addressing foreseeable risks, it was not guilty of the charge.
The company was also acquitted of two specific offenses under the Occupational Health and Safety Code.
The decision is a reminder of the importance of comprehensive and up-to-date safety procedures. An employer must be diligent about identifying and addressing safety issues in the workplace, and consider safety in all aspects of employment and operations. Ideally, a strong safety program prevents accidents. But if an accident occurs, an employer will want to know, and be able to demonstrate, that it did everything possible to protect its workers.
Tuesday, July 7, 2009
Fourth of July Fireworks

This past weekend I spent the Fourth of July in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho. On the banks of Coeur d'Alene Lake I witnessed perhaps the most garish spectacle of fireworks, not to mention complete disregard for personal safety, I have ever seen.
Along the banks of the lake were cabins and cottages whose inhabitants each settled on the beach to ignite tens of thousands of dollars of fireworks from the beaches around the lake.
I saw not one pair of safety glasses, protective gloves or any concern for personal safety. Disposing of spent fireworks cartridges into the roaring campfire was the norm. As it turns out, almost ten thousand injuries happen in the United States each year around Independence day weekend. No small wonder.
There are no safe-use handling requirements, you can purchase fireworks by the pallet (yes you can for just over $1000) and there is little regard for personal safety when you're drinking and letting your ten year-old fire off the first few rounds. All of these things I personally witnessed. If I am not exposed to fireworks for a full year, I'll be OK with that.
Not much wonder that so many employers feel resistance to safety training. If the idiots who feel the need to blow hundreds of dollars to watch their children almost get their fingers blown off and call it entertainment, then the chances of a real safety message that could save lives is going to be a tough sell.